|
Nuclear Weapons
Abolish or Perish
by Andreas Toupadakis
"We could take a strike, survive and then hit back. Pakistan would be finished."
George Fernandes, Defense Minister of India.
As the new year finds humanity confused and in fear because of the acts of illegal
terrorists, some of the world's leaders are taking steps to terrorize humanity even
further.
There is a need to speak and act because besides our leaders, perhaps most of the
citizens of the world still think of national defense and national interests. If
the very few remaining wise, world leaders do not succeed in convincing the rest
to adopt a world policy of nonviolence, soon our world as we have known it for thousands
of years will be no more.
Retired Air Force General Lee Butler, former Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Strategic
Command, from an address to the National Press Club, February 1998: "I was responsible
for war plans with more than 12,000 targets, many to be struck with repeated nuclear
blows, some to the point of complete absurdity. ... And in the end, I came away from
it all with profound misgivings and with a set of deeply unsettling judgments: That
from the earliest days of the nuclear era, the risks and consequences of nuclear
war have never been properly weighed by those who brandished it; that the stakes
engage not just the survival of the antagonists, but the fate of humankind. ... Their
effects transcend time and place, poisoning the Earth and deforming its inhabitants
for generation upon generation. They leave us wholly without defense, expunge all
hope for meaningful survival. They hold in their sway not just the fate of nations
but the very meaning of civilization. ... At worst it invokes death on a scale rivaling
the power of the creator. ... It is time to reassert the primacy of individual conscience,
the voice of reason, and the rightful interests of humanity." General Lee Butler's
address to the National Press Club in February 1998 can be found at: http://www.noetic.org/Ions/publications/review_archives/46/issue46_38.html
Unfortunately General Lee Butler spoke in this way after he retired.
Former President Jimmy Carter, also after he retired, said, "I think it can
be said that the world is facing a nuclear crisis. Unfortunately, US policy has had
a good deal to do with creating it. ... I believe that the general public would be
extremely concerned if these facts were widely known, but so far such issues have
not been on the agenda in presidential debates."
The complete article Mr. Jimmy Carter wrote on February 23, 2000 can be found at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/2000-02/23/008l-022300-idx.html
Today we desperately need leaders to take a stand for world peace while they are
discharging their duties, not after they retire.
Unfortunately today many people still speak of war as a method to resolve disputes.
But they should be reminded of Einstein's words, words that alas! most of our leaders
have ignored:
"For there is no secret and there is no defense; there is no possibility of
control except through the aroused understanding and insistence of the peoples of
the world."
Einstein says that there is no defense, no protection, for a world having nuclear
weapons or in general, weapons of mass destruction, unless people understand the
enormous danger, and unless they insist. Insist on what? Unless they insist on not
just the abolition of weapons of mass murder but also the abolition of war. How?
By talking to the leaders in well-ventilated and comfortable rooms? No! What then?
By sending petitions and appeals, writing manifestos, books and articles, and traveling
around the world giving lectures? No! By refusing to serve in the army? Now you have
started talking! By refusing to pay taxes and therefore being jailed? Now you are
talking! By massive global demonstrations many weeks if not months or years long,
besides all the other acts were mentioned before? Now you are really talking! Now
there is some hope for world survival. Word survival will not come raped in a silver
box. It will come only by voluntary suffering. Why do we keep denying it? Until when
we will keep denying it?
But how many people will protest and call these views extreme? How extreme is the
reality of the possibility that we are ready to destroy all that we see around us
and ourselves forever? Was Bertrand Russell an extremist? He wrote the Russell-Einstein
manifesto that every citizen of the world should be aware of. People can read it
at: http://www.wagingpeace.org/doc/russel_einstein_manifesto.html
Russell stated in 1955 and many prominent scientists agreed: "The time has come,
or is about to come, when only large-scale civil disobedience, which should be nonviolent,
can save the populations from the universal death which their governments are preparing
for them."
Senator Alan Cranston, after he retired, writes in 1999: "One super bomb could
now loose more destructive energy than all that has been released from all weapons
fired in all wars in all history. The power of self-extinction is now in our uncertain
hands. ... It is more likely now than it was during the more stable days of the Cold
War that weapons of mass destruction will be used." You can read his letter
at: http://www.gsinstitute.org/news_arch/cranston.html
Former Secretary of Defense William Perry says, "It isn't a question of whether,
but of where and when." General Charles Horner, who commanded Allied Air Forces
in the Gulf War, says he expects that a nuclear weapon will be exploded in some city
in the next 10 years. These weapons have cost U.S. taxpayers over $5 trillion so
far. They presently cost $37 billion a year - diverting money from other needs. Is
it worthy of our nation to base its security on terror, on the threat to annihilate
millions of innocent humans, on the threat of genocide? Is our policy of Mutual Assured
Destruction - a policy that puts the human race at risk of extinction- worthy of
civilization?
After we have become aware of these facts, should we still advocate war to solve
our problems today? Why do we support leaders who advocate war? It seems that our
leaders do not know the facts, or they do but they think that everything will be
fine. If they think that everything will be fine by following the course we follow
today in world affairs, they need to be awakened soon by the people of the earth
to the fact that they live in a great illusion.
The truth is that when people are talking about war these days, they are talking
about the end of life on earth at any moment, even by accident, but they do not really
know it. People that talk aggressively about war usually belong to the army or they
work for weapons. However, most people of the earth's population are like little
children playing on a playground. A dozen prominent doctors have diagnosed their
mother with terminal cancer, and she will live no more than two months. She is in
the hospital and her husband knows her condition. When their father goes to the playground
to get the kids, they ask him, "When will mommy come home? Is she okay?"
He looks into their eyes, feels sorry for them, and says, "She will be back
soon; she will be fine." He has lied to them. Only a miracle will spare him
from falsehood.
Some advocates of the New World Order are saying, "Do not worry, we are in control.
Weapons of mass destruction will never be used." But most people deny the fact
that insiders speak of "when," while outsiders speak of "if."
Which should we believe? We do not want to believe the insiders, but my destiny was
such that I became an insider for a while. Now, therefore, I speak as an insider,
as many others, and say that if we continue on the same path we are now on, it is
just a matter of a short time until we see what people have been afraid of for thousands
of years.
Therefore the question is are we going to change our direction? Are we going to make
the right choice and abolish war itself, since nuclear knowledge can never go away
as long as there are human beings on earth? No, we are not going to make the right
choice as long as people are not informed. And people are not going to become informed
as long as there are people in power that believe in one world government, believe
that they are better than others, and somehow believe that they belong to a race
which God has destined to govern and subdue. The lovers of the empire have become
prisoners of the imperial designs of the empire.
No, we are not going to make the right choice as long as the people of the earth,
you and I, do not bow down before something infinitely greater than ourselves. Because
when we are deprived of the infinitely great, we cannot go on living, and we will
die of despair by just pushing the button.
We can hope only if we adopt complete nonviolence, if we adopt the nonviolence of
the strong, not the nonviolence of the weak. The nonviolence of the weak is to wait
until everybody agrees to abolish weapons of mass destruction. Most likely that will
never happen. We must advocate the nonviolence of the strong, i.e. the unconditional
and voluntary unilateral abolition of weapons of mass destruction. That requires
trusting that the opponent will do likewise and at the same time, risking even your
whole nation for your love to save the whole world. That faith and voluntary sacrifice
by the leaders and the people of a nation requires surrendering to the infinitely
great; it requires faith in the most fundamental principle that keeps the world still
turning. That principle is that your brother is the same as you.
The unilateral abolition of nuclear weapons has already started taking place. I am
aware of one ex-Soviet state that has done just that. See at: http://www.gn.apc.org/cndyorks/news/articles/nukesdestroyed.htm
The advocates of the doctrine of deterrence will argue that Ukraine's abolition of
nuclear weapons was not purely voluntary but out of necessity because the collapse
of the Soviet Union and its financial needs. That is true, but it still does not
answer the question: While Russia, the United States, Britain, China, and France
gave security guarantees to Ukrainian officials and foreign governments gave financial
assistance to assist their disarmament, who will provide wisdom to the officials
of the strong to do likewise? While they assist the weak to disarm, they themselves
continue to build up, their armaments. Who will make them see their folly?
I can say, therefore, with confidence that only a miracle will spare our leaders
from falsehood. Do you believe in miracles? If you do not believe, and because now
you know the facts, you are most likely in despair. But you need not be in despair.
We need to act all together and act soon. Only our selfless acts can make the miracle
happen.
|