|
Last Updated:
Jun 10th, 2007 - 17:13:45
Affiliates
Powells.com
Favorite Links
American Friends Service Committee
Friends Committee on National Legislation
National Catholic Reporter
British Broadcasting Company
The Guardian
Christian Science Monitor
LA Times
SF Gate
Oregonian
The Register Guard
Environmental News Network
Sojourners
Orion
Swans Commentary
Federation of American Scientists
Car Free Times
Indy Media
AlterNet.org
Common Dreams
The Nation
Utne Reader
Eugene Weekly
Willamette Week
Portland Tribune
Bitter Lemons.org
The Travels of our First Webmaster
|
|
|
Voices of the Northwest
Sadler's Sense: Narrowcasting to Different Worlds
... this permanent fragmentation of mass market media is on display during every “debate” held by the presidential candidates of the two major parties. Not only are the audiences much smaller, the candidates appear to come from two different worlds.
By Russell Sadler
Posted on Jun 10, 2007 |
Email this article
Printer friendly page
|
We are living through an historic transition in our state and federal politics.
The early onset of a presidential race that will not be decided until November 2008 reflects a fervent desire to move past the Bush regime and its mounting baggage of blunders.
The large number of candidates in each party -- with front runners like Hillary Clinton challenged by a younger generation and veterans like John McCain fading -- creates a fluid situation that has some voters nostalgic for successful politicians of the recent past.
Some Oregonians say they long for the next Tom McCall. Nationally, some Republicans long for the next Ronald Reagan.
That is unlikely to happen. McCall and Reagan were men of their own time and that time has passed. McCall and Reagan were creatures of a mass media culture created largely by three television networks that replaced mass circulation magazines by the 1960s.
Both men were successful because they knew how to appeal to the mass audience television created. It is not a coincidence that both McCall and Reagan began their careers as broadcasters.
In the last few decades, however, the advent of cable and satellite transmission of news and the Internet has reduced broadcasting to narrowcasting, with smaller audiences and content deliberately designed to attract a specific, narrow demographic audience to be sold to very specific advertisers -- just the opposite of the mass market audience that McCall and Reagan appealed to with such skill.
The effect of this permanent fragmentation of mass market media is on display during every “debate” held by the presidential candidates of the two major parties. Not only are the audiences much smaller, the candidates appear to come from two different worlds.
The Democrats debate ways to end the war in Iraq and how to finance domestic policy like universal health care, while the Republicans debate the use of torture and ways to be “successful” in Iraq. Democrats want to create a “path to citizenship” for undocumented immigrants encouraged to enter this country illegally by a deliberate policy of not enforcing immigration laws over the past 20 years. Republican candidates want to frog-march the “illegals” to the border regardless of the economic or social consequences of such mass expulsion.
These candidates are trying to appeal to voters in at least two distinct political worlds while the crossover voters look in on the debate like voyeurs.
How did this happen?
Narrowcasting has created a climate in which anyone can find a “news” program that tells him what he wants to hear without listening to anything that contradicts his preconceived notions. That is Roger Ailes’ model for Rupert Murdock’s Fox “News” Channel. It is the model of talk show “hosts” from Rush Limbaugh to Lars Larson.
The late sociologist and U.S. Senator from New York, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, famously said, “Every man is entitled to his own opinions. He is not entitled to his own facts.”
Narrowcasting allows commercial outlets to create their own reality -- their own facts -- for their true believers. This is not news, of course. It is sheer propaganda designed by publicists masquerading as newscasters who have learned to divide the nation in order to conquer public opinion.
I first wrote a column on the fragmentation of the mass media and the consequences of narrowcasting in the late 1990s.
Former congressman Les AuCoin read it and asked me, “So how are we going to govern the country if everyone is operating on different facts?”
I responded, “I don’t know.” A decade later, one answer is obvious. We are not governing the country. We have two sets of leaders from at least two different worlds. They talk past one another. They appear incapable of communicating with each other and exhibit little respect for those who differ. It is more acute among Republicans than Democrats. Nonaffiliated voters are usually ignored.
Hillary Clinton and John McCain are practicing mass media politics in a world of narrowcasting. McCain is fading. If Clinton is nominated, she might become our last mass media president.
Barrack Obama may have something to offer. He is appealing to a diverse group -- younger and broader politically -- that seems to defy the deliberately circumscribed demographic categories of narrowcasting. We’ll see.
Of one thing I am sure. We will not see another Tom McCall or Ronald Reagan. The conditions that allowed these men to communicate so successfully with the voters no longer exist.
Copyright ©2007 by Russell Sadler
Russell Sadler is a journalist and a lecturer at Southern Oregon University when he isn't sailing. You may write him c/o publisher at westbynorthwest.org. Visit Sadler's Sense columns at West By Northwest.org:
Sadler's Sense: Under the Big Top
Sadler's Sense: Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtin
Sadler's Sense: Regional Solutions for Global Climate Change Is Key
Sadler's Sense:s Oregon Ready for Prime Time Primary?
Sadler's Sense: Enter Westlund for Senator?
Sadler's Sense: What Do You Know! Hunger No Longer Exists in USA
Sadler's Sense: Saxton No Tom McCall
Sadler's Sense: Measure 45, The Way We Never Were
Sadler's Sense: A Squandered Legacy?
Sadler's Sense: A Snapshot of Electorial Politics and Power in Oregon
Sadler's Sense: Sea Change
Sadler's Sense: Ben Westlund's Bid for Governor and Why He Makes Sense
Sadler's Sense: Croesus and Responsibility
Sadler's Sense: Can We Kick the "Kicker" Habit? Or... the Big Lie
Sadler's Sense: Enter Starret Stage Right -- Now a Four Way Race for Governor and Freeway Nation or Free Nation?
Sadler's Sense: How Portland Lost a University for 100 Years
Sadler's Sense: Beyond Industrial Forestry
Sadler's Sense: Who Can Bridge the Great Divide?
Sadler's Sense: Peer Review and Politics
Sadler's Sense: Of Forests and The River
Sadler's Sense: Development and Belief --Who Pays?
Sadler's Sense: Time Out of Mind
Sadler's Sense: Draining America First Oil Policy Inadequate to the Energy Challenge
Sadler's Sense: Holly, Folly and Why Its Ok to Cut Christmas Trees
Sadler's Sense: We Need the Constitutional Limits of the Initiative Process
Sadler's Sense: Learning from the Katrina Moment
Sadler's Sense: A Right to Die?
Sadler's Sense: Who Are These Candidates Representing?
Sadler's Sense: The Birth Tax
Sadler's Sense: The Thin Veneer
Sadler's Sense: Gas Policy After Katrina-- Oregon Can Lead the Way Again
Sadler's Sense: Oregon's Supreme Court Take on "Takings" Flies on Eagle Wings
Sadler's Sense: Legislature's Sandbox Politics Irresponsible
Sadler's Sense: Beyond Dorchester - Can Our Traditional Parties Stand for Anything Substantive?
Sadler's Sense: The Oregon Gasoline Tax, Pork Barrel Projects and Big Brother
Sadler's Sense: A Classic Conservative Judge Who Conserves the Law
Sadler's Sense: On the Economic Ramparts--The Northwest, Defazio and CAFTA
Sadler's Sense: Can Dissatisfaction Become a Wave for Political Sanity?
Sadler's Sense: Oregon's Public Lands Patrimony in Danger Once Again
Sadler's Sense: Driving a Road to State Religion?
Sadler's Sense: Remembering Roy Lieuallen and his Legacy
Sadler's Sense: The Big Sky Game: Manufacturers, Airlines and Competing Visions
Sadler's Sense: On Death: Our Challenged Autonomy
Sadler's Sense: Who Is in Charge of the State's Purse?
Sadler's Sense: The Risks of Shifting Higher Ed.'s Costs and Who Pays
Sadler's Sense: The Good Ship School Finance Is Sinking
Sadler's Sense: Infrastructure Renewal Needed
Sadler's Sense: The Unlikely Poster Child for Measure 37
Sadler's Sense: Of Myths, Money and Machines, Why We Blame the Owl
Sadler's Sense: Not Window Dressing
Sadler's Sense: From Constantine to George, God's Will and Secular Power
Sadler's Sense: Credibility or State of Our State
Sadler's Sense: Look in the Mirror, Oregon
Sadler's Sense: Why We Must Pay the Piper Now
Sadler's Sense: A Short History of Measure 30
© Copyright 2000-2006 by West By Northwest.org
Top of Page
untitled
|
|
|
